🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.