🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.